Research type:
|
Methodology |
Title (lead author) etc:
|
A systematic review of outcome measures used in forensic mental health research with consensus panel opinion (Fitzpatrick) 94 pages, Volume 14, number 18 |
DOI
|
10.3310/hta14180 |
View/print executive summary
View/print abstract
View full text in pdf format (868 KB)
Go to our correspondence page to comment on this publication
|
Headline: |
Study found that a wide range of domains are relevant to assessing outcomes of interventions in forensic mental health services, with recidivism being a very high priority. Evaluations need to take account of public safety, but also clinical, rehabilitation and humanitarian outcomes, and greater attention should be given to validity of measurement |
Special notes |
Commissioned under the Research Methodology Programme as Project RM04/JH26/RF. |
This report should be referenced as follows: |
Fitzpatrick R, Chambers J, Burns T, Doll H, Fazel S, et al. A systematic review of outcome measures used in forensic mental health research with consensus panel opinion. Health Technol Assess
2010;14(18).
|
Project ref: |
06/91/11 |
Original project title: |
Critical review of outcome measures for use in forensic mental health studies |
Chief Investigator: |
Professor Ray Fitzpatrick, Professor of Public Health and Primary Care,
Division of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford
|
Start Date: |
January 2006 |
Date of publication in HTA journal series |
April 2010
|
Cost: |
£106,577 |
Project Protocol: |
Project protocol not available
|
Printed copies of this title despatched:
|
120 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month) |
URL of this page: |
http://www.hta.ac.uk/1583 |
News feeds