References

  1. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. BMJ 1998;316:463-466.
  2. Garcia J, Sinclair J, Dickson K, Thomas J, Brunton J, Tidd M, the PSHE Review Group (2006) Conflict resolution, peer mediation and young people’s relationships. Technical report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=708
  3. Grant-Pearce, C., Miles, I. & Hills, P. Mismatches in Priorities for Health Research between Professionals and Consumers PREST Manchester University 1998
  4. Hanley et al, Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research: Briefing notes for researchers, INVOLVE 2004 (http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/Briefing%20Note%20Final.dat.pdf )
  5. Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ 2001;322:519–23.
  6. INVOLVE, Guide to reimbursing and paying members of the public actively involved in research, INVOLVE 2006 (http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/Payment_Guidefinal240806.pdf )
  7. INVOLVE, Public Information Pack Booklets 1- 4: How to get actively involved in NHS, public health and social care research, INVOLVE 2007 (http://www.invo.org.uk/All_Publications.asp )
  8. Langston, A. L . ; McCallum, M.; Campbell, M. K.; Cameron, M.; Robertson, C.; & Ralston, S. H. An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Clinical Trials 2005 2 (1) 80-87.
  9. Lumley J, Oliver S, Waters E. Smoking cessation programs implemented during pregnancy. (Cochrane Review) In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 1998. Updated quarterly.
  10. Murphy, M.K. Black, N.A. Lamping, D.L. McKee, C.M. Sanderson, C.F.B. Askham, J. et al. Consensus development methods and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess 1998; Vol. 2:3.
  11. Oliver S, Oakley L, Lumley J, Waters E. Smoking cessation programmes in pregnancy: systematically addressing development, implementation, women’s concerns and effectiveness. Health Education Journal 2001; 60 (4) 362 – 370
  12. Rees R and Oliver S (2007) An example from health promotion. In Coren E (ed) (2007) Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews. London. Social Care Institute for Excellence; pp15 –34. (http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/details.asp?pubID=125)
  13. Rees R, Kavanagh J, Burchett H, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Harden A, Thomas J, Oliver S, Oakley A (2004) HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): a systematic review of research relevant to the development and implementation of effective and appropriate interventions. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 190 pages.
  14. Renfrew M, McCandlish R. Renfrew MJ, McCandlish R 1992 - With women: new steps in research in midwifery. In: Roberts H (ed). Women’s Health Matters. Routledge, London.
  15. Telford, R, Beverley, CA, Cooper CL, Boote JD. Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction? British Journal of Clinical Governance 2002; 7 (2): 92-103.
  16. Telford R, Boote JD, Cooper CL (2004) What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations 7(3):209-20.
  17. Wiggins M, Oakley A, Roberts I, Turner H, Rajan L, Austerberry H, Mujica R, Mugford M (2004) The Social Support and Family Health Study: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of two alternative forms of postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged inner-city areas. Health Technol Assess 2004; Vol 8:32

Advanced search How to use the search function