Research type:
|
Methodology |
Title (lead author) etc:
|
Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care (Hutchinson) 170 pages, Volume 14, number 10 |
DOI
|
10.3310/hta14100 |
View/print executive summary
View/print abstract
View full text in pdf format (2403 KB)
Outputs from this project
Go to our correspondence page to comment on this publication
|
Headline: |
Study found that gains may be made in clinical audit and evaluation through better understanding of the products of the different methods of review, and of the value of careful selection and training of reviewers |
Special notes |
Commissioned under the Research Methodology Programme as Project RM03/JH08/AH. |
This report should be referenced as follows: |
Hutchinson A, Coster J E, Cooper K L, McIntosh A, Walters S J, et al. Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care. Health Technol Assess
2010;14(10).
|
Project ref: |
06/91/02 |
Original project title: |
Comparative study of different methods to assess quality of care/safety |
Chief Investigator: |
Professor Allen Hutchinson, Director of Public Health and Dep Dean of ScHARR,
Department of Public Health, University of Sheffield
|
Start Date: |
June 2004 |
Date of publication in HTA journal series |
March 2010
|
Cost: |
£472,176 |
Project Protocol: |
Project protocol not available
|
Printed copies of this title despatched:
|
112 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month) |
URL of this page: |
http://www.hta.ac.uk/1575 |
News feeds